Besser v Kermode [2011] NSWCA 174
Section 26 of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), properly construed, does not permit a defendant to plead back any of the plaintiff's imputations as contextual imputations to establish a defence of contextual truth; contextual imputations must be additional to those of which the plaintiff complains.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Heard Concurrently; Appeal From Supreme Court of NSW Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed (after granting leave).
- Legal Topics
- ['contextual Truth Defence' 'pleading in Defamation' 'uniform Defamation Laws' 'interpretation of Defamation Act 2005 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Heard Concurrently; Appeal From Supreme Court of NSW Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether s 26 of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) permits a defendant to 'plead back' the plaintiff's imputations as contextual imputations for the purpose of establishing the defence of contextual truth." 'Whether the statutory context and history support the continuation of the pleading-back practice under the 2005 Act.']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 26 of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), properly construed, does not permit a defendant to plead back any of the plaintiff's imputations as contextual imputations to establish a defence of contextual truth; contextual imputations must be additional to those of which the plaintiff complains.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed (after granting leave).
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal.' 'Appellant to file the draft notice of appeal in a form which conforms to the issue raised on appeal within 7 days of these orders.' 'Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment