Regis Towers Real Estate P/L v CSS Holdings P/L & 2Ors (1611/01); Regis Towers Real Estate P/L v Peter Kelly Flooring P/L & 2 Ors (1612/01) [2001] NSWSC 139

Regis Towers Real Estate P/L v CSS Holdings P/L & 2Ors (1611/01); Regis Towers Real Estate P/L v Peter Kelly Flooring P/L & 2 Ors (1612/01) [2001] NSWSC 139

The by-laws and management agreement, properly construed, do not confer an exclusive right on the Plaintiff to act as selling agent for all strata lots and do not preclude owners from appointing their own selling agents; such a construction avoids unreasonable restraint of trade and is consistent with statutory...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Determination of a Separate Question
Outcome
Plaintiff's summons dismissed in both proceedings.
Legal Topics
['conveyancing' 'strata Titles Act' 'by Laws Interpretation' 'restraint of Trade' 'strata Management Agreements' 'restriction on Transfer of Units']
['property Law' 'equity'] ['conveyancing' 'strata Titles Act' 'by Laws Interpretation' 'restraint of Trade' 'strata Management Agreements' 'restriction on Transfer of Units']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment After Determination of a Separate Question

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether strata by-laws or management agreement confer exclusive rights upon Plaintiff to act as sole selling agent for strata owners' 'Whether owners are precluded from appointing their own selling agents' 'Proper construction of by-law and management agreement provisions on exclusivity']

Ratio Decidendi

The by-laws and management agreement, properly construed, do not confer an exclusive right on the Plaintiff to act as selling agent for all strata lots and do not preclude owners from appointing their own selling agents; such a construction avoids unreasonable restraint of trade and is consistent with statutory provisions.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's summons dismissed in both proceedings.

Orders

  • ["The separate question is answered 'No' (Plaintiff does not have exclusivity)." "Plaintiff's summons dismissed in each case." "Plaintiff to pay each Defendant's costs, subject to certain conditions regarding the Third Defendants' retainer."]