Frigger v Trott (No 2) [2021] FCA 192
The application to punish the registrar for contempt was held to be frivolous and vexatious because the prior court order set aside the registrar's rejection decision but did not require the registrar to take any positive act. There was no order capable of being disobeyed or breached; thus, no contempt could be committed. The administrative steps following the setting aside of the registrar's decision were not the subject of any order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Applications / Interlocutory Application (not Accepted for Filing)
- Outcome
- Application to punish for contempt not accepted for filing (frivolous and vexatious)
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Court' 'federal Court Procedure' 'judicial Review' 'court Directions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Applications / Interlocutory Application (not Accepted for Filing)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent registrar could be punished for contempt for not resetting a rejected e-lodgement after a judicial review order set aside a rejection decision' 'Whether an order was made that was capable of being disobeyed so as to found a contempt charge based on breach of an order' 'Whether comments in reasons for judgment can found a contempt charge']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to punish the registrar for contempt was held to be frivolous and vexatious because the prior court order set aside the registrar's rejection decision but did not require the registrar to take any positive act. There was no order capable of being disobeyed or breached; thus, no contempt could be committed. The administrative steps following the setting aside of the registrar's decision were not the subject of any order.
Court Disposition
Application to punish for contempt not accepted for filing (frivolous and vexatious)
Orders
- ['Pursuant to r 2.27(e) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the documents in lodgement 947499 must not be accepted for filing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment