Re Wright, Fay Therese & Anor v Cruise, Reginald Laurence & Anor [1984] FCA 35

Re Wright, Fay Therese & Anor v Cruise, Reginald Laurence & Anor [1984] FCA 35

Because the payment of $6,282.73 to the second respondent was liable to be set aside as within the relation back period or as a preference, having regard to the knowledge of both respondents, the first respondent had no sufficient interest in the funds to support the second respondent's asserted solicitor's lien. The second respondent could have no better right than his client, and the applicant as trustee was entitled to recover the amount.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 March 1984
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application by Trustee for Declaration and Consequential Relief Concerning Funds Held by Second Respondent
Outcome
Application granted; the second respondent was declared to have no lien over the $6,282.73 and was ordered to pay it to the applicant as trustee of the bankrupt estate.
Legal Topics
['relation Back' 'property Divisible Among Creditors' 'solicitor Retaining Lien' 'recovery of Payment Made by Bankrupt' 'bankruptcy Notice and Sequestration Order']
['bankruptcy' "solicitors' Liens"] ['relation Back' 'property Divisible Among Creditors' 'solicitor Retaining Lien' 'recovery of Payment Made by Bankrupt' 'bankruptcy Notice and Sequestration Order']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Application / Application by Trustee for Declaration and Consequential Relief Concerning Funds Held by Second Respondent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sum of $6,282.73 paid by the bankrupt to the second respondent and held on behalf of the first respondent was property of the applicant as trustee of the bankrupt estate.' "Whether the second respondent had a solicitor's lien over the funds for professional costs and disbursements allegedly owed by the first respondent in other matters." 'Whether the payment was liable to be set aside as a transaction within the relation back period or as a preference.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the payment of $6,282.73 to the second respondent was liable to be set aside as within the relation back period or as a preference, having regard to the knowledge of both respondents, the first respondent had no sufficient interest in the funds to support the second respondent's asserted solicitor's lien. The second respondent could have no better right than his client, and the applicant as trustee was entitled to recover the amount.

Court Disposition

Application granted; the second respondent was declared to have no lien over the $6,282.73 and was ordered to pay it to the applicant as trustee of the bankrupt estate.

Orders

  • ['Declare that the second respondent has no lien over the sum of $6,282.73 the subject of this application.' 'Order that the second respondent pay the said sum to the applicant as trustee of the bankrupt estate of Fay Therese Wright.']