RELC v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 383

RELC v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 383

The trial judge gave an unjustified unreliability warning regarding the evidence of the appellant's daughter without a corresponding warning for the complainant's evidence, despite both children being of similar age. This imbalance influenced the likelihood of acquittal, occasioned a serious injustice, and warranted quashing the convictions and ordering a new trial.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Convictions and sentences quashed. New trial ordered.
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Conviction' 'act of Indecency' 'sexual Offences Against Children' 'jury Warnings' 'evidence of Children' 'miscarriage of Justice']
['criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['appeal Against Conviction' 'act of Indecency' 'sexual Offences Against Children' 'jury Warnings' 'evidence of Children' 'miscarriage of Justice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Appeal From Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in allowing transcripts and recordings of evidence to be taken into the jury room' 'Whether appropriate warnings and directions were given to the jury regarding evidence-in-chief and evidence given via CCTV' 'Whether transcript provision constituted miscarriage of justice' "Whether improper cross-examination occurred with respect to the appellant's wife" "Whether warnings regarding unreliability of a child's evidence were appropriately given under s 165 and s 165B Evidence Act"]

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge gave an unjustified unreliability warning regarding the evidence of the appellant's daughter without a corresponding warning for the complainant's evidence, despite both children being of similar age. This imbalance influenced the likelihood of acquittal, occasioned a serious injustice, and warranted quashing the convictions and ordering a new trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Convictions and sentences quashed. New trial ordered.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The convictions and sentences are quashed.' 'Order a new trial.']