Lord v Broken Hill Cobalt Project Pty Limited [2023] NSWLEC 70
The scope of the remitter from the Court of Appeal permits the Land and Environment Court to consider further submissions relating to the quantification of compensation payable for the heads of loss identified at [43] and [44]-[46] of Lord No 1, including the filing of new submissions or evidence if allowed by the Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Remitter Following Appeal
- Outcome
- directions issued for further submissions on quantification of compensation
- Legal Topics
- ['remitter' 'land Access' 'compensation Quantification' 'adequacy of Reasons']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Remitter Following Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['scope of remitter from the Court of Appeal' 'quantification of compensation payable for compensable losses under Mining Act 1992 (NSW)' 'adequacy of reasons for compensation determination']
Ratio Decidendi
The scope of the remitter from the Court of Appeal permits the Land and Environment Court to consider further submissions relating to the quantification of compensation payable for the heads of loss identified at [43] and [44]-[46] of Lord No 1, including the filing of new submissions or evidence if allowed by the Court.
Court Disposition
directions issued for further submissions on quantification of compensation
Orders
- ['Any application to rely upon further evidence on the remitter is to be filed and served within 7 days of judgment publication and is returnable at 9am on 27 July 2023.' 'If no application for further evidence is made, Respondents are to file and serve written submissions on compensation quantification by 28 July...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment