THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES v KARP [1988] NSWCA 120
Due to the convictions for serious offences and the opponent's indication not opposing the application, the Court declared professional misconduct and ordered removal from the Roll; sufficient consent existed for the single Judge's jurisdiction under s46 Supreme Court Act 1970.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales; Opponent: Ross John Karp
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Removal From Roll of Solicitors / Application for Order by Consent Before Single Judge of Appeal
- Outcome
- Declaration of professional misconduct and removal from Roll of Solicitors granted.
- Legal Topics
- Removal From Roll, Professional Misconduct, Jurisdiction of Single Judge of Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Claimant
Ross John Karp
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Removal From Roll of Solicitors / Application for Order by Consent Before Single Judge of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the solicitor's convictions amount to professional misconduct justifying removal from the Roll
- 2 Whether sufficient consent exists to empower a single Judge of Appeal to make orders under s46 Supreme Court Act 1970
Ratio Decidendi
Due to the convictions for serious offences and the opponent's indication not opposing the application, the Court declared professional misconduct and ordered removal from the Roll; sufficient consent existed for the single Judge's jurisdiction under s46 Supreme Court Act 1970.
Court Disposition
Declaration of professional misconduct and removal from Roll of Solicitors granted.
Orders
- Declare the opponent has been guilty of professional misconduct.
- Order the opponent's name be removed from the Roll of Solicitors of the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment