Mortimore v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2010] FCA 537
There is a prima facie case of contravention of ss 38 and 44 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth); the balance of convenience favours continuation and variation of interlocutory orders restraining interference, obstruction, and coercion by CFMEU officials at the site.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Orders and Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders continued and varied; costs reserved; directions hearing listed.
- Legal Topics
- ['building Industrial Action' 'interlocutory Relief' 'coercion Regarding Enterprise Agreements']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Orders and Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether conduct by CFMEU officials constitutes 'building industrial action' under s 38 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth)" 'Whether CFMEU officials took action with intent to coerce or apply undue pressure to make a building enterprise agreement (s 44 of the Act)' 'Entitlement to interlocutory relief under ss 39(2) and 49 of the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
There is a prima facie case of contravention of ss 38 and 44 of the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth); the balance of convenience favours continuation and variation of interlocutory orders restraining interference, obstruction, and coercion by CFMEU officials at the site.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders continued and varied; costs reserved; directions hearing listed.
Orders
- ["Orders made on 20 May 2010 varied by adding subparagraph 1(f): 'interfering with the site or its perimeter fencing.'" "Removal and insertion of 'and' as specified in paragraphs (d) and (e) of previous orders." 'Proceeding listed for directions on 4 June 2010.' 'Costs reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment