CSR LTD v RENDELL and ANOR; NSW SUGAR MILLING CO-OP LTD v RENDELL [1996] NSWCA 133

CSR LTD v RENDELL and ANOR; NSW SUGAR MILLING CO-OP LTD v RENDELL [1996] NSWCA 133

Despite some evidence regarding plaintiff's knowledge and potential satisfaction of pre-conditions for extension, the speculative nature of damage quantification and plaintiff's earlier knowledge made it unjust and unreasonable to extend the limitation periods for actions against both defendants.

Parties
Defendant: CSR Ltd; Defendant: NSW Sugar Milling Co-operative Ltd; Plaintiff: Rendell
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 August 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Leave and Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; extension orders set aside; plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Industrial Deafness, Extension of Limitation Periods, Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CSR Ltd

Defendant

NSW Sugar Milling Co-operative Ltd

Defendant

Rendell

Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Leave and Appeal

  1. 1 Whether extension of time to bring claim under Limitation Act 1969 s60G/s60I is just and reasonable
  2. 2 Whether plaintiff satisfied pre-conditions for extension under s60I(1)(a)
  3. 3 Assessment of damages amidst uncertainty and intervening causes

Ratio Decidendi

Despite some evidence regarding plaintiff's knowledge and potential satisfaction of pre-conditions for extension, the speculative nature of damage quantification and plaintiff's earlier knowledge made it unjust and unreasonable to extend the limitation periods for actions against both defendants.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; extension orders set aside; plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted and appeal allowed with costs
  • Orders of Cramer-Roberts ADCJ set aside