Repatriation Commission v. Wright, B.M. [1987] FCA 430
For the reasons given in Smith (No. T5 of 1987), the appeal was allowed because the Tribunal considered the wrong date and misapplied the standard of proof; the matter was to be reconsidered with correct legal tests applied.
- Parties
- Applicant: Repatriation Commission; Respondent: Byron Maxwell Wright
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From a Decision of the Veterans' Appeals Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Pension, Special Rate Pension, Interpretation of Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, Interpretation of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, Standard of Proof, Criteria for Pension Eligibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Repatriation Commission
Applicant
Byron Maxwell Wright
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From a Decision of the Veterans' Appeals Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the criteria in s.24 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 are to be considered at the date of application or retirement
- 2 Whether eligibility for special rate depends upon existence of continuing economic loss
- 3 The proper interpretation of s.120(4) of the Act (standard of proof)
Ratio Decidendi
For the reasons given in Smith (No. T5 of 1987), the appeal was allowed because the Tribunal considered the wrong date and misapplied the standard of proof; the matter was to be reconsidered with correct legal tests applied.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal be allowed with costs.
- The Tribunal's decision be set aside and the matter remitted to the Tribunal to be heard and decided again with the hearing of further evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment