Repatriation Commission v Codd [2005] FCA 910

Repatriation Commission v Codd [2005] FCA 910

A certificate under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 should be granted because the AAT's error of law occurred in the administration of beneficial legislation intended to assist veterans and dependants, and the complexity of the legislation contributed to the respondent's position.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Application for Costs Certificate After Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Certificate for costs granted to the respondent
Legal Topics
["veterans' Benefits" 'costs on Appeal' 'exercise of Discretion in Awarding Costs Certificates']
['administrative Law'] ["veterans' Benefits" 'costs on Appeal' 'exercise of Discretion in Awarding Costs Certificates']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Application for Costs Certificate After Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a certificate for costs should be granted under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 in relation to the appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal']

Ratio Decidendi

A certificate under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 should be granted because the AAT's error of law occurred in the administration of beneficial legislation intended to assist veterans and dependants, and the complexity of the legislation contributed to the respondent's position.

Court Disposition

Certificate for costs granted to the respondent

Orders

  • ['The Court certifies that it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 in respect of the costs incurred by the respondent in relation to the appeal.']