Repatriation Commission v Spargo [2001] FCA 380

Repatriation Commission v Spargo [2001] FCA 380

A person allotted for duty in an operational area who is injured en route and never actually serves within that area is not deemed to have rendered 'operational service' under s 6C of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth). Section 6C(3) governs the period of operational service but does not override the requirement in s 6C(1) for actual service in the operational area.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['operational Service' 'meaning of Operational Service' "veterans' Entitlements Act Interpretation"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal

  1. 1 ["Whether the respondent rendered 'operational service' within the meaning of s 6C of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) when he was allotted for duty in an operational area but injured en route and never actually served in that area."]

Ratio Decidendi

A person allotted for duty in an operational area who is injured en route and never actually serves within that area is not deemed to have rendered 'operational service' under s 6C of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth). Section 6C(3) governs the period of operational service but does not override the requirement in s 6C(1) for actual service in the operational area.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal is set aside.' 'The case is remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to be heard and decided again.']