Repatriation Commission v Spargo [2001] FCA 380
A person allotted for duty in an operational area who is injured en route and never actually serves within that area is not deemed to have rendered 'operational service' under s 6C of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth). Section 6C(3) governs the period of operational service but does not override the requirement in s 6C(1) for actual service in the operational area.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['operational Service' 'meaning of Operational Service' "veterans' Entitlements Act Interpretation"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent rendered 'operational service' within the meaning of s 6C of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) when he was allotted for duty in an operational area but injured en route and never actually served in that area."]
Ratio Decidendi
A person allotted for duty in an operational area who is injured en route and never actually serves within that area is not deemed to have rendered 'operational service' under s 6C of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth). Section 6C(3) governs the period of operational service but does not override the requirement in s 6C(1) for actual service in the operational area.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal is set aside.' 'The case is remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to be heard and decided again.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment