RES Southern Cross v Minister for Planning and Taralga Landscape Guardians Inc. [2009] NSWLEC 1034
The Court accepted the uncontradicted acoustic evidence that the previously envisaged random single-visit noise testing would not assist in determining compliance with condition 42, while a useful regime compliant with the South Australian guidelines would likely amount to de facto continuous monitoring, which had been rejected in the original proceedings. Because the modified turbines would cause at worst an imperceptible increase in noise, the Court accepted the applicant's amended noise conditions 51 to 53A. On Tablelands Basalt Forest, the evidence that additional turbine rows on basaltic soils may contain remnants warranted precautionary investigation, so all turbine rows other than...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Development Consent Modification Application / Remitter on Appeal for Further Consideration of Conditions of Consent
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and the development consent modified by amendment of the conditions of consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent Modification' 'wind Farm' 'operational Noise Monitoring' 'endangered Ecological Community' 'tablelands Basalt Forest' 'conditions of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Consent Modification Application / Remitter on Appeal for Further Consideration of Conditions of Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the conditions of consent should require a random noise testing regime for the modified wind farm.' 'Whether revised noise compliance conditions 51 to 53A should be accepted.' 'Which turbine rows should be subject to precautionary survey requirements for possible Tablelands Basalt Forest Endangered Ecological Community.' 'Whether orders modifying the development consent should be entered or take effect immediately.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted the uncontradicted acoustic evidence that the previously envisaged random single-visit noise testing would not assist in determining compliance with condition 42, while a useful regime compliant with the South Australian guidelines would likely amount to de facto continuous monitoring, which had been rejected in the original proceedings. Because the modified turbines would cause at worst an imperceptible increase in noise, the Court accepted the applicant's amended noise conditions 51 to 53A. On Tablelands Basalt Forest, the evidence that additional turbine rows on basaltic soils may contain remnants warranted precautionary investigation, so all turbine rows other than...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and the development consent modified by amendment of the conditions of consent.
Orders
- ['The further orders are not to take effect until they are entered.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'The Development Consent given by the Court on 12 February 2007 to Development Application 241/04 is modified by amendment of the conditions of consent as set out in Schedule 1.' 'The Exhibits are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment