UBS AG v TyneCitation:[2018] HCA 45Before:Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJDate:17 Oct 2018Case Number:B54/2017Read more
The court held that the pursuit of substantially the same claims in the Federal Court after discontinuance and permanent stay in the Supreme Court proceedings constituted an abuse of process, justifying a permanent stay.
- Parties
- Respondent: Respondent (in personal capacity); Other: Former trustee; Other: Related company
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Permanent Stay of Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Overarching Purpose of Civil Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Respondent (in personal capacity)
Respondent
Former trustee
Other
Related company
Other
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuit of substantially the same claims in the Federal Court after discontinuance and permanent stay in the Supreme Court constitutes an abuse of process
- 2 Whether the Full Court erred in finding no abuse of process and setting aside the permanent stay
- 3 Whether the Full Court failed to consider the overarching purpose of civil litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the pursuit of substantially the same claims in the Federal Court after discontinuance and permanent stay in the Supreme Court proceedings constituted an abuse of process, justifying a permanent stay.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permanent stay of proceedings in the Federal Court reinstated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment