Restifa & Partners Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1432
Because the parties reached agreement at the conciliation conference, the amended plans and supporting documents resolved the contentions, the proposal satisfied the relevant requirements including s 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and there were no jurisdictional impediments, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement and approve the amended development application subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of a Development Application / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; amended development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'deemed Refusal' 'conciliation Conference' 'concept Development' 'torrens Title Subdivision' 'residential Flat Buildings' 'clause 4.6 Variation' 'height of Buildings Development Standard']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of a Development Application / Conciliation Conference; Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders in accordance with the parties' agreement reached at the conciliation conference." 'Whether Development Application No. SPP-17-00039, as amended, satisfied the relevant statutory planning requirements and could be approved subject to conditions.' 'Whether the amended Clause 4.6 variation application in relation to the height of buildings development standard should be upheld.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement at the conciliation conference, the amended plans and supporting documents resolved the contentions, the proposal satisfied the relevant requirements including s 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and there were no jurisdictional impediments, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement and approve the amended development application subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; amended development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans, drawings and material listed at Annexure A and referred to in part in the conditions of consent at Annexure C.' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW),...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment