Bellach v Chamberlain [2011] NSWSC 528

Bellach v Chamberlain [2011] NSWSC 528

Bulk paid $37,500 for the deposit and $151,166.61 from its bank account towards the purchase price of Wyebeleena. The evidence did not establish that those payments discharged debts owed to Mr Bellach, were loans, or were gifts, and there was no evidence rebutting the presumption of resulting trust. Mr Bellach therefore held a 188666/375000 share in Wyebeleena on resulting trust for Bulk, free of any mortgage debt except insofar as such debt is not satisfied by Mr Bellach out of his share or otherwise.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Summons and Cross Summons Concerning Caveatable Interest, Resulting Trust and Voidable Transactions / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Order for resulting trust made; plaintiff's summons dismissed; cross-claimants succeeded on the cross-summons to the extent of a proportionate interest in Wyebeleena for Bulk.
Legal Topics
['resulting Trusts' 'caveatable Interests' 'insolvent Transactions' 'uncommercial Transactions' 'presumption of Insolvency' 'voidable Transactions']
['equity' 'trusts' 'corporations'] ['resulting Trusts' 'caveatable Interests' 'insolvent Transactions' 'uncommercial Transactions' 'presumption of Insolvency' 'voidable Transactions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Division Summons and Cross Summons Concerning Caveatable Interest, Resulting Trust and Voidable Transactions / Principal Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Mr Chamberlain or Bulk had a caveatable interest in Wyebeleena.' "Whether payments from Bulk's bank account towards the purchase of Wyebeleena were loans to Mr Bellach, repayments of debts owed by Bulk to him, gifts, or contributions to the purchase price giving rise to a resulting trust." 'Whether Bulk was entitled to a charge over Wyebeleena to secure $188,666 plus interest.' 'Whether payments by Bulk totalling $209,466.61 were voidable transactions pursuant to s 588FE of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether the payments were insolvent and uncommercial transactions, and whether a loan by a company is a transaction under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).']

Ratio Decidendi

Bulk paid $37,500 for the deposit and $151,166.61 from its bank account towards the purchase price of Wyebeleena. The evidence did not establish that those payments discharged debts owed to Mr Bellach, were loans, or were gifts, and there was no evidence rebutting the presumption of resulting trust. Mr Bellach therefore held a 188666/375000 share in Wyebeleena on resulting trust for Bulk, free of any mortgage debt except insofar as such debt is not satisfied by Mr Bellach out of his share or otherwise.

Court Disposition

Order for resulting trust made; plaintiff's summons dismissed; cross-claimants succeeded on the cross-summons to the extent of a proportionate interest in Wyebeleena for Bulk.

Orders

  • ['The summons should be dismissed.' 'No further orders as to costs on the summons should be made.' 'There should be an order for transfer of the proportionate interest in Wyebeleena to Bulk, the second cross-claimant.' 'The registered mortgagee has an indefeasible interest.' 'The cross-defendant should pay the costs...