R v AB; R v CD; R v EF [2023] NSWCCA 168
The phrase 'to obtain or retain business' in s 70.2(1)(c)(i) of the Criminal Code (Cth) is not limited to directly obtaining or retaining business. The distinction between direct and indirect connection adopted by the trial judge is not warranted by the statutory language or extrinsic materials. Accordingly, agreements to provide payments for purposes such as remaining in a tender process or ensuring project smoothness may be capable, depending on the evidence, of amounting to agreements to provide a benefit in order to obtain or retain business under the relevant statutory provisions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (legal Questions Reserved After Acquittal) / Determination of Legal Questions Under S 108(2) Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 (nsw)
- Outcome
- Questions of law answered: No to all (i.e., the restricted interpretations proposed were rejected)
- Legal Topics
- ['bribery of Foreign Public Officials' 'conspiracy' 'statutory Interpretation' 'elements of Offence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (legal Questions Reserved After Acquittal) / Determination of Legal Questions Under S 108(2) Crimes (appeal and Review) Act 2001 (nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the phrase 'to obtain or retain business' in s 70.2(1)(c)(i) of the Criminal Code (Cth) is limited to directly obtaining or retaining business" 'Whether certain payments intended to affect tender process or project implementation can amount to agreements to provide benefits in order to obtain or retain business']
Ratio Decidendi
The phrase 'to obtain or retain business' in s 70.2(1)(c)(i) of the Criminal Code (Cth) is not limited to directly obtaining or retaining business. The distinction between direct and indirect connection adopted by the trial judge is not warranted by the statutory language or extrinsic materials. Accordingly, agreements to provide payments for purposes such as remaining in a tender process or ensuring project smoothness may be capable, depending on the evidence, of amounting to agreements to provide a benefit in order to obtain or retain business under the relevant statutory provisions.
Court Disposition
Questions of law answered: No to all (i.e., the restricted interpretations proposed were rejected)
Orders
- ['Question 1: No' 'Question 2: No' 'Question 3: No']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment