SafeWork NSW v Rex Australia Pty Ltd; SafeWork NSW v Wei Wang [2021] NSWDC 334
The risk of a worker being struck or crushed by an unsecured load being lifted by a forklift was obvious and foreseeable, the likelihood of the risk occurring was relatively high because there were no effective controls separating workers and forklifts and the revised procedure required a worker to stand and walk alongside the load, the potential consequences were serious injury or death, and inexpensive and straightforward controls were available and promptly implemented after the incident. Rex and Mr Wang were each culpable in the mid range. Rex's prior similar conviction and the substantial injury were aggravating factors; remorse and early guilty pleas warranted mitigation, including...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution for Work Health and Safety Offences / Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- Rex Australia Pty Ltd and Wei Wang were convicted and fined after pleas of guilty.
- Legal Topics
- ['duty of Persons Conducting a Business or Undertaking' 'officer Due Diligence' 'risk of Death or Serious Injury' 'forklift Safety' 'objective Seriousness' 'plea of Guilty' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'capacity to Pay a Fine' 'prosecution Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Work Health and Safety Offences / Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What penalty should be imposed on Rex Australia Pty Ltd for failing to comply with its work health and safety duty and exposing a worker to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to s 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW).' 'What penalty should be imposed on Wei Wang for failing, as an officer of Rex, to exercise due diligence to ensure Rex complied with its work health and safety duty, exposing a worker to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to s 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW).' 'Whether the objective seriousness and culpability of each offender was in the mid range.' 'Whether the offenders had discharged the evidentiary onus of proving limited capacity to pay a fine.' 'Whether orders should be made for 50% of the fines to be paid to the prosecutor and for prosecution costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
The risk of a worker being struck or crushed by an unsecured load being lifted by a forklift was obvious and foreseeable, the likelihood of the risk occurring was relatively high because there were no effective controls separating workers and forklifts and the revised procedure required a worker to stand and walk alongside the load, the potential consequences were serious injury or death, and inexpensive and straightforward controls were available and promptly implemented after the incident. Rex and Mr Wang were each culpable in the mid range. Rex's prior similar conviction and the substantial injury were aggravating factors; remorse and early guilty pleas warranted mitigation, including...
Court Disposition
Rex Australia Pty Ltd and Wei Wang were convicted and fined after pleas of guilty.
Orders
- ['The offender Rex Australia Pty Ltd is convicted.' 'The appropriate fine for Rex Australia Pty Ltd is $300,000 but that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the plea of guilty.' 'Rex Australia Pty Ltd is ordered to pay a fine of $225,000.' "Pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW), 50% of Rex Australia...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment