Reysson Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 [2020] NSWCA 281
On proper statutory construction, s 6(1) of the Coastal Management Act 2016 (NSW) does not impose an objective jurisdictional fact as a precondition to validly identifying land as coastal wetlands and littoral rainforests area by SEPP; the task of identification is evaluative and policy-driven, not for de novo judicial determination; the mapping of a generic proximity area/buffer is rational and proportionate to statutory purposes; and the Governor may lawfully adopt by reference maps approved by the Minister in making a SEPP—there being no statutory requirement for the Governor to approve or directly consider the map.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Land and Environment Court ([2019] NSWLEC 203)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; appellant to pay the costs of the respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Interpretation' 'jurisdictional Fact' 'environmental Planning Instrument Validity' 'coastal Protection Mapping' 'legislative Instrument Validity' 'development Control']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Land and Environment Court ([2019] NSWLEC 203)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 6(1) of the Coastal Management Act 2016 (NSW) contains a jurisdictional fact fixing the power to identify land as within the coastal wetlands and littoral rainforests area' "Whether the 100 metre 'proximity area' mapped is rational and proportionate to the legislative scheme" 'Whether the Governor was required to have approved or considered the relevant map when making the Coastal Management SEPP']
Ratio Decidendi
On proper statutory construction, s 6(1) of the Coastal Management Act 2016 (NSW) does not impose an objective jurisdictional fact as a precondition to validly identifying land as coastal wetlands and littoral rainforests area by SEPP; the task of identification is evaluative and policy-driven, not for de novo judicial determination; the mapping of a generic proximity area/buffer is rational and proportionate to statutory purposes; and the Governor may lawfully adopt by reference maps approved by the Minister in making a SEPP—there being no statutory requirement for the Governor to approve or directly consider the map.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; appellant to pay the costs of the respondent.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed' 'Appellant to pay the costs of the respondent']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment