Abarghan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1246
The applicant advanced no basis establishing the pleaded grounds. The Court was unable to perceive any error of law in the Tribunal's reasons, and there was material before the Tribunal capable of justifying its conclusions. No other ground under s 476(1) was shown to apply, so the application for review failed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Order of Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Judicial Review of Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection (class Xa) Visas
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection (class Xa) Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal Review' 'judicial Review Under Migration Act 1958 (cth) S 476' 'error of Law' 'no Evidence or Other Material to Justify Decision' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'political Opinion and Mujahideen E Khalq']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for an Order of Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Federal Court Judicial Review of Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection (class Xa) Visas
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal decision involved an error of law within Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476(1)(e).' 'Whether there was no evidence or other material to justify the making of the Tribunal decision within Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476(1)(g).' 'Whether any other ground in Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476(1) was applicable.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant advanced no basis establishing the pleaded grounds. The Court was unable to perceive any error of law in the Tribunal's reasons, and there was material before the Tribunal capable of justifying its conclusions. No other ground under s 476(1) was shown to apply, so the application for review failed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment