RFD Australia Pty Limited v Guo & The Nominal Defendant No. 1 [2012] NSWDC 133
Consequent upon the findings in the related proceedings, the plaintiff succeeded against Mr Peng Guo for the undisputed workers' compensation payments and agreed interest, failed against the Nominal Defendant, and the respective cross-claims between defendants were dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Tort Claim for Recovery of Workers' Compensation Payments Arising From a Motor Vehicle Accident / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of $33,632.95; judgment for the second defendant on the plaintiff's claim; cross-claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ["subrogated Action by Employer's Workers' Compensation Insurer" "recovery of Workers' Compensation Payments" "defendants' Cross Claims"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Tort Claim for Recovery of Workers' Compensation Payments Arising From a Motor Vehicle Accident / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff could recover workers' compensation payments made to Mrs Bidaya Eltana from the first defendant pursuant to s 151Z of the Workers' Compensation Act 1987." "Whether the plaintiff's claim against the Nominal Defendant should succeed." "Whether the defendants' cross-claims should be dismissed."]
Ratio Decidendi
Consequent upon the findings in the related proceedings, the plaintiff succeeded against Mr Peng Guo for the undisputed workers' compensation payments and agreed interest, failed against the Nominal Defendant, and the respective cross-claims between defendants were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of $33,632.95; judgment for the second defendant on the plaintiff's claim; cross-claims dismissed.
Orders
- ['Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff RFD Australia Pty Limited against the first defendant, Mr Peng Guo, in the sum of $33,632.95.' "Verdict and judgment for the second defendant, the Nominal Defendant on the plaintiff's claim against that defendant." "The first defendant, Mr Peng Guo, is to pay the plaintiff's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment