RFZD v Commissioner of Taxation [2023] FCA 324
The appeal was found incompetent because the applicant was a deregistered company and therefore not a legal person able to maintain proceedings. The solicitors for the applicant failed to discharge the burden of establishing competency of the appeal. As continuing the appeal was hopeless after the solicitors were put on notice, costs were awarded against them, including indemnity costs from 11 October 2022 onwards.
- Parties
- Applicant: RFZD; Respondent: Commissioner of Taxation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Objection to Competency of Appeal and Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent; costs awarded against applicant's solicitors, including indemnity costs from 11 October 2022.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Competency, Deregistration of Company, Costs Against Solicitors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RFZD
Applicant
Commissioner of Taxation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Objection to Competency of Appeal and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal instituted on behalf of a deregistered company is competent
- 2 Whether solicitors can be ordered to pay costs on an indemnity basis for maintaining an incompetent appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was found incompetent because the applicant was a deregistered company and therefore not a legal person able to maintain proceedings. The solicitors for the applicant failed to discharge the burden of establishing competency of the appeal. As continuing the appeal was hopeless after the solicitors were put on notice, costs were awarded against them, including indemnity costs from 11 October 2022 onwards.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent; costs awarded against applicant's solicitors, including indemnity costs from 11 October 2022.
Orders
- Pursuant to rule 33.30(5) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the appeal is dismissed.
- The solicitors on the record for the applicant named in the notice of appeal are to pay the respondent's costs in the appeal, including any reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed: (a) up to 10 October 2022, as costs as between party and party; and (b) on and from 11 October 2022, as costs on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment