RG v R [2010] NSWCCA 173
The evidence challenged on appeal was not admitted as tendency evidence but as context (relationship) evidence to place the complainant's account in context. Judicial directions were properly provided to the jury limiting its use. The requirements of ss 97 and 101 of the Evidence Act 1995 were not triggered. There was no error of law by the trial judge and the ground of appeal was not established.
- Parties
- Applicant: RG; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Indecent Assault, Sexual Offences Against Person Under 16, Appeal Against Conviction, Context Evidence Vs Tendency Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RG
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred by failing to adequately distinguish between tendency and context evidence
- 2 Whether the trial judge permitted tendency evidence to be led before the Jury otherwise than in accordance with ss 97 and 101 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence challenged on appeal was not admitted as tendency evidence but as context (relationship) evidence to place the complainant's account in context. Judicial directions were properly provided to the jury limiting its use. The requirements of ss 97 and 101 of the Evidence Act 1995 were not triggered. There was no error of law by the trial judge and the ground of appeal was not established.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment