R v RGG [1999] NSWCCA 81

R v RGG [1999] NSWCCA 81

The combination of circumstances and weaknesses in the complainant’s evidence, including inconsistencies, improbabilities, lack of corroboration, and the lengthy delay in complaint, gave rise to a reasonable doubt that could not be resolved by the jury’s advantage in observing witnesses. Accordingly, the convictions were unsafe and must be set aside, and verdicts of acquittal entered.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 April 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction in Court of Criminal Appeal From Verdict in District Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; convictions and sentences set aside; verdicts of acquittal substituted.
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Conviction' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'standard of Proof' 'sexual Offences Against Children']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction in Court of Criminal Appeal From Verdict in District Court

  1. 1 ['Whether the verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence' 'Whether a verdict of acquittal should be entered in lieu']

Ratio Decidendi

The combination of circumstances and weaknesses in the complainant’s evidence, including inconsistencies, improbabilities, lack of corroboration, and the lengthy delay in complaint, gave rise to a reasonable doubt that could not be resolved by the jury’s advantage in observing witnesses. Accordingly, the convictions were unsafe and must be set aside, and verdicts of acquittal entered.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; convictions and sentences set aside; verdicts of acquittal substituted.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is allowed.' 'Convictions and sentences set aside.' 'Verdicts of acquittal substituted.']