RHONDA HAZEL CONNOLLY v. E I DICKSON [1992] NSWLEC 53 (17 July 1992) [1992] NSWLEC 2
Burnum Burnum was not qualified to stand for election because his enrolment as a member of the Local Aboriginal Land Council was not validly effected under the Act; the regulatory provisions that purported to allow his enrolment without formal acceptance at a council meeting (cls 22(4) and (5)) were ultra vires and invalid, rendering the election void.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted, cross-application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983' 'regulation Making Powers' 'election Qualification' 'statutory Construction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Was Burnum Burnum qualified to stand for election as councillor of the New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council?' 'If not, is there a vacancy, and how is the vacancy to be filled?']
Ratio Decidendi
Burnum Burnum was not qualified to stand for election because his enrolment as a member of the Local Aboriginal Land Council was not validly effected under the Act; the regulatory provisions that purported to allow his enrolment without formal acceptance at a council meeting (cls 22(4) and (5)) were ultra vires and invalid, rendering the election void.
Court Disposition
application granted, cross-application dismissed
Orders
- ['The first respondent and his servants and agents are restrained from declaring Burnum Burnum elected as a member of the New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council to represent the South Coast region.' 'The relevant respondent is restrained from acting or purporting to act as a councillor of the New South Wales...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment