Close v Close [2001] NSWSC 668

Close v Close [2001] NSWSC 668

Additional provision of $138,000 ought to be made for the plaintiff from the estate, given her needs and circumstances, even in light of substantial funds previously received by her and despite the spendthrift conduct of the defendant. The needs of both siblings must be balanced, and as the plaintiff had not explained a portion of her previous assets, only a partial adjustment is warranted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Equity / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff with additional provision ordered
Legal Topics
['testamentary Intention' 'adequate Provision for Maintenance' 'freedom of Testamentary Intention' "executor's Duties"]
['equity' 'family Provision'] ['testamentary Intention' 'adequate Provision for Maintenance' 'freedom of Testamentary Intention' "executor's Duties"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity / Final Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether adequate provision has been made for the plaintiff out of the deceased's estate under the Family Provision Act 1982 s 7" "Whether the court should interfere with the testatrix's testamentary intention" "Appropriate adjustment to beneficiary shares given applicant's needs and estate's size" 'Impact of spendthrift behaviour on provision under the Act' "Executor's compliance with trustee duties"]

Ratio Decidendi

Additional provision of $138,000 ought to be made for the plaintiff from the estate, given her needs and circumstances, even in light of substantial funds previously received by her and despite the spendthrift conduct of the defendant. The needs of both siblings must be balanced, and as the plaintiff had not explained a portion of her previous assets, only a partial adjustment is warranted.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff with additional provision ordered

Orders

  • ['The plaintiff, in addition to provision under the will, is to be paid an additional lump sum of $138,000 from the estate (excluding jewellery).' 'The estate is to pay the plaintiff’s costs on a party/party basis.' 'The estate is to pay the defendant’s costs on a party/party basis.']