Riad Taha v R. [2017] NSWDC 180
The state of the current law does not allow the punishment for possession of contraband by an inmate to commence at the expiration of a non-parole period due to the effect of s 58 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, necessitating the backdating of the sentence to the date of conviction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Severity Appeal / Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['offender With Mobile Phone in Custodial Setting' 'limits on Start Date of Sentence' 'sentencing' 'corrective Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Severity Appeal / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Local Court was empowered to set the commencement date of a custodial sentence after the non-parole period for an aggregate sentence' 'Effect of s 58 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act on new sentences for inmates already serving significant periods']
Ratio Decidendi
The state of the current law does not allow the punishment for possession of contraband by an inmate to commence at the expiration of a non-parole period due to the effect of s 58 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, necessitating the backdating of the sentence to the date of conviction.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed.' 'Conviction confirmed.' 'Three month fixed term of imprisonment confirmed.' 'Start date of sentence varied from 10 January 2020 to 20 March 2017.' 'Registrar to forward copy of remarks to Minister for Correctional Services and Attorney General.' 'Copy of remarks to be placed on the case law...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment