Upton v Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1336
Given the poor prospects of the appellant's appeal and the prompt application for security, it is appropriate to order security for costs in the sum of $8333, calculated based on a one-day hearing, notwithstanding potential impact on the appellant's ability to proceed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Richard Austin Upton; Respondent: Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Security for costs ordered; appeal stayed pending provision of security; costs of motion awarded to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Appeal, Discretionary Factors, Stifling Appeal, Prospects of Success
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Austin Upton
Appellant
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Should an order for security for costs be made in the appeal?
- 2 Would such an order stifle the appeal?
- 3 Were the circumstances causing the appellant's inability to provide security caused by the respondent?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the poor prospects of the appellant's appeal and the prompt application for security, it is appropriate to order security for costs in the sum of $8333, calculated based on a one-day hearing, notwithstanding potential impact on the appellant's ability to proceed.
Court Disposition
Security for costs ordered; appeal stayed pending provision of security; costs of motion awarded to respondent.
Orders
- The appellant is to provide security for the respondent's costs of the appeal in the sum of $8333 in such form as may be agreed between the parties or, failing agreement, in a form acceptable to the Tasmania District Registrar of the Court.
- The appeal is stayed until such security is provided or until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment