Paddon v Repatriation Commission (No 2) [2010] FCA 1161

Paddon v Repatriation Commission (No 2) [2010] FCA 1161

Although the appeal was dismissed and the ordinary rule would favour costs following the event, Mr Paddon achieved forensic success on two construction issues and on the adequacy of the tribunal's reasons, while his concession on clinical onset meant the appeal was ultimately futile. Balancing those competing factors, the Court made no order as to costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; Application for Costs / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
No order as to costs.
Legal Topics
['costs Discretion' 'costs Follow the Event' 'forensic Success on Issues' 'appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; Application for Costs / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Appeal

  1. 1 ["Whether the Repatriation Commission should receive an order for costs after Mr Paddon's appeal was dismissed." "Whether Mr Paddon's forensic success on construction and reasons issues justified departing from the ordinary costs consequence."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the appeal was dismissed and the ordinary rule would favour costs following the event, Mr Paddon achieved forensic success on two construction issues and on the adequacy of the tribunal's reasons, while his concession on clinical onset meant the appeal was ultimately futile. Balancing those competing factors, the Court made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs.

Orders

  • ['There be no order as to costs.']