Broers, Richard & Anor v Misossiou, Peter [1984] FCA 413
The Court found the trial judge's assessment for past economic loss did not sufficiently discount for the real possibility of periods of unemployment and the respondent's pre-existing degenerative spinal condition. The award for past economic loss was reduced by $5,000, and future economic loss was reduced to...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Richard Broers; Appellant: Hans Hoogvliet; Respondent: Peter Misossiou
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment varied by reducing damages to $144,019.55.
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Assessment of Damages, Economic Loss, Appeal, General Damages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Broers
Appellant
Hans Hoogvliet
Appellant
Peter Misossiou
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the assessment of damages for economic loss and general damages was excessive or inadequate.
- 2 Whether the respondent was incapacitated for heavy or light work as a result of his injuries.
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in finding the respondent's lower back pain was not disabling.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the trial judge's assessment for past economic loss did not sufficiently discount for the real possibility of periods of unemployment and the respondent's pre-existing degenerative spinal condition. The award for past economic loss was reduced by $5,000, and future economic loss was reduced to $50,000, resulting in the total judgment being reduced to $144,019.55. The awards for general damages and the absence of an allowance for future medical expenses were upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment varied by reducing damages to $144,019.55.
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Order of Kelly J. varied by substituting for the amount of the judgment the sum of $144,019.55
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment