Broers, Richard & Anor v Misossiou, Peter [1984] FCA 413

Broers, Richard & Anor v Misossiou, Peter [1984] FCA 413

The Court found the trial judge's assessment for past economic loss did not sufficiently discount for the real possibility of periods of unemployment and the respondent's pre-existing degenerative spinal condition. The award for past economic loss was reduced by $5,000, and future economic loss was reduced to...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Richard Broers; Appellant: Hans Hoogvliet; Respondent: Peter Misossiou
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 December 1984
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment varied by reducing damages to $144,019.55.
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Assessment of Damages, Economic Loss, Appeal, General Damages
Tort Law Personal Injury Assessment of Damages Economic Loss Appeal General Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Broers

Appellant

Hans Hoogvliet

Appellant

Peter Misossiou

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the assessment of damages for economic loss and general damages was excessive or inadequate.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was incapacitated for heavy or light work as a result of his injuries.
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in finding the respondent's lower back pain was not disabling.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the trial judge's assessment for past economic loss did not sufficiently discount for the real possibility of periods of unemployment and the respondent's pre-existing degenerative spinal condition. The award for past economic loss was reduced by $5,000, and future economic loss was reduced to $50,000, resulting in the total judgment being reduced to $144,019.55. The awards for general damages and the absence of an allowance for future medical expenses were upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment varied by reducing damages to $144,019.55.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Order of Kelly J. varied by substituting for the amount of the judgment the sum of $144,019.55