Butler v Taylor & anor [2016] NSWLEC 1427
Although the trees are of mixed species and likely create a severe obstruction of sunlight to windows, the principal windows affected are not principal living areas and the applicant's interest does not outweigh the undesirability of interfering with the trees; thus, s 14E(2)(b) is not satisfied and no orders are made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trees Disputes Between Neighbours' 'obstruction of Sunlight' 'hedge Definition' 'discretion Under S 14 E(2)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether trees constitute a 'hedge' under Part 2A" 'Whether trees severely obstruct sunlight to windows' "Whether applicant's interest outweighs undesirability of interfering with the trees"]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the trees are of mixed species and likely create a severe obstruction of sunlight to windows, the principal windows affected are not principal living areas and the applicant's interest does not outweigh the undesirability of interfering with the trees; thus, s 14E(2)(b) is not satisfied and no orders are made.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment