Chang v Kur-ring-gai Council [2022] NSWLEC 1240
The request to remove Tree 2 is unreasonable and unnecessary in the absence of expert evidence showing significant risk, particularly as the tree is in good health, poses a low risk, and is part of a critically endangered ecological community.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Removal' 'critically Endangered Ecological Communities' 'risk to Property and Life' 'development Control Plans']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether consent should be granted for the removal of Tree 2 (Sydney Red Gum) on grounds of risk and impact on a critically endangered ecological community' 'Whether sufficient evidence justifies removal or further pruning of the tree']
Ratio Decidendi
The request to remove Tree 2 is unreasonable and unnecessary in the absence of expert evidence showing significant risk, particularly as the tree is in good health, poses a low risk, and is part of a critically endangered ecological community.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment