RICHARD DAVID GODFREY v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK (2001) NSWSC [2001] NSWSC 977

RICHARD DAVID GODFREY v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK (2001) NSWSC [2001] NSWSC 977

The plaintiff did not dispute indebtedness but claimed relief under the Consumer Credit Code based on alleged injustice. Evidence showed the Bank provided relevant information as required by statute, had no knowledge of substantial hardship, and the payment history indicated ability to comply. There was no prima facie case for relief; the Magistrate did not err in granting summary judgment.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['summary Judgment' 'unjust Credit Contracts' 'appeals From Local Court']
['civil Procedure' 'consumer Credit'] ['summary Judgment' 'unjust Credit Contracts' 'appeals From Local Court']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Magistrate erred in law in striking out the plaintiff's grounds of defence and granting summary judgment" 'Whether the credit contract was unjust under the Consumer Credit Code 1995']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff did not dispute indebtedness but claimed relief under the Consumer Credit Code based on alleged injustice. Evidence showed the Bank provided relevant information as required by statute, had no knowledge of substantial hardship, and the payment history indicated ability to comply. There was no prima facie case for relief; the Magistrate did not err in granting summary judgment.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal is granted (if required)' 'The appeal is dismissed' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs"]