Richard Ehiozee v EDO Nigerian Association of New South Wales Incorporated & Ors [2012] NSWSC 718
The 29 December 2010 invitation was defective as a notice under cl 16(2), because it gave no particulars of a complaint within cl 16(1)(a) or (b) and did not give at least 14 days for submissions, but declaratory relief was refused because the invitation was not acted on and no adverse resolution resulted, so no good purpose would be served. The 15 January 2011 executive committee resolution was a nullity because the constitution contained no effective provision for the office of patron and the resolution purported to strip the plaintiff of a non-existent office; declaratory relief was justified because the resolution arose from a divisive dispute, was detrimental to the plaintiff's...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications / Hearing of Claims for Declaratory Relief; Defamation Claim to Be Tried at Some Future Time
- Outcome
- Declaration granted concerning the 15 January 2011 executive committee resolution; declaration concerning the 29 December 2010 invitation refused; costs outstanding.
- Legal Topics
- ['compliance With Disciplinary Procedure Under Association Constitution' 'validity of Executive Committee Resolution' 'declaratory Relief' 'natural Justice' 'internal Disputes Between Association Members']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications / Hearing of Claims for Declaratory Relief; Defamation Claim to Be Tried at Some Future Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the 29 December 2010 invitation to attend a disciplinary committee meeting was invalid under cl 16(2) of the association's constitution." 'Whether declaratory relief should be granted concerning the 29 December 2010 invitation.' 'Whether the executive committee resolution made on or about 15 January 2011 concerning the plaintiff was invalid and of no effect.' 'Whether declaratory relief should be granted concerning the 15 January 2011 resolution.']
Ratio Decidendi
The 29 December 2010 invitation was defective as a notice under cl 16(2), because it gave no particulars of a complaint within cl 16(1)(a) or (b) and did not give at least 14 days for submissions, but declaratory relief was refused because the invitation was not acted on and no adverse resolution resulted, so no good purpose would be served. The 15 January 2011 executive committee resolution was a nullity because the constitution contained no effective provision for the office of patron and the resolution purported to strip the plaintiff of a non-existent office; declaratory relief was justified because the resolution arose from a divisive dispute, was detrimental to the plaintiff's...
Court Disposition
Declaration granted concerning the 15 January 2011 executive committee resolution; declaration concerning the 29 December 2010 invitation refused; costs outstanding.
Orders
- ['Declaration that the resolution of the executive committee of the first defendant made on or about 15 January 2011, concerning the plaintiff, is invalid and of no effect.' 'The parties are directed to arrange with the associate by 4pm 6 July 2012 for the matter to be re-listed for directions as to any argument as...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment