Ferguson v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd. [2005] NSWIRComm 1117

Ferguson v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd. [2005] NSWIRComm 1117

The Commission refused to grant interim orders because the applicant's position no longer existed under the respondent's control, no suitable alternative position was identified, and the orders sought were too imprecise to enforce.

Parties
Applicant: Richard Ferguson; Respondent: Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Orders Preventing Termination/unfair Dismissal / Interim Decision
Outcome
Application for interim orders refused; application to proceed to hearing.
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Employment Contracts, Interlocutory Relief
Industrial Law Unfair Dismissal Redundancy Employment Contracts Interlocutory Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Ferguson

Applicant

Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Orders Preventing Termination/unfair Dismissal / Interim Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to interlocutory orders preventing termination of employment
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is obliged to provide ongoing employment to the applicant in circumstances of redundancy

Ratio Decidendi

The Commission refused to grant interim orders because the applicant's position no longer existed under the respondent's control, no suitable alternative position was identified, and the orders sought were too imprecise to enforce.

Court Disposition

Application for interim orders refused; application to proceed to hearing.