R v Richard Fojt [2011] NSWCCA 20
The original sentences imposed were manifestly inadequate in light of the offences' seriousness, and the sentencing judge's findings—although open to her—did not justify the degree of leniency. A revised sentence properly reflects the objective and subjective circumstances, applies an appropriate discount for an early plea, and aligns with the legislative guideposts for offences of this kind.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Respondent: Richard Fojt
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence set aside and replaced with new sentence.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Aggravated Break and Enter, Reckless Wounding, Objective Seriousness of the Offence, Standard Non Parole Period, Totality Principle, Manifest Inadequacy of Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Richard Fojt
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to determine the objective seriousness of the offences
- 2 Whether the finding of objective seriousness was erroneously below mid-range
- 3 Whether adequate regard was had to the standard non-parole period
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentences imposed were manifestly inadequate in light of the offences' seriousness, and the sentencing judge's findings—although open to her—did not justify the degree of leniency. A revised sentence properly reflects the objective and subjective circumstances, applies an appropriate discount for an early plea, and aligns with the legislative guideposts for offences of this kind.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence set aside and replaced with new sentence.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Set aside the sentence imposed in the District Court of NSW by English DCJ on 9 July 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment