Squires, Richard James v Stephenson, Keith & Ors In the matter of an Application by Flight Stewards Association of Australia pursuant to s 171C of the Act [1983] FCA 65
Amended Rule 32(b) contravenes s.140(1)(c) by vesting sole power to amend the Association's rules in the Council and not enabling members to initiate amendments; Rule 15(c) contravenes s.140 by permitting notice of general meetings by advertisement in a newspaper; relief under s.171C is refused as the Court should not validate amendments in contravention of s.140. The Court will stand over application V No.6 of 1981 to allow the Association to address the defects, but will make a declaration that Rule 15(d) contravenes s.140(1).
- Parties
- Applicant: Richard James Squires; Respondents: Keith Stephenson and Ors.; Applicant in N.s.w. No.41 of 1982: Flight Stewards' Association of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Post Trial; Reasons for Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Application under s.171C (N.S.W. No.41 of 1982) dismissed; orders made in part in V No.6 of 1981; balance of relief stood over for a fixed period; declaration that Rule 15(d) contravenes s.140(1) of the Act made; liberty to apply reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Registered Organisations, Amendment of Rules, Contravention of Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, Validity of Rule Amendment Procedures, Notice Requirements for General Meetings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard James Squires
Applicant
Keith Stephenson and Ors.
Respondents
Flight Stewards' Association of Australia
Applicant in N.s.w. No.41 of 1982
Procedural Posture
Application / Post Trial; Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether resolutions amending the Association's rules were invalid or a nullity under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
- 2 Whether amended rule procedures and notice provisions contravene s.140 of the Act
- 3 Whether the Court should grant relief under s.171C for asserted invalidities in the amendment of rules
Ratio Decidendi
Amended Rule 32(b) contravenes s.140(1)(c) by vesting sole power to amend the Association's rules in the Council and not enabling members to initiate amendments; Rule 15(c) contravenes s.140 by permitting notice of general meetings by advertisement in a newspaper; relief under s.171C is refused as the Court should not validate amendments in contravention of s.140. The Court will stand over application V No.6 of 1981 to allow the Association to address the defects, but will make a declaration that Rule 15(d) contravenes s.140(1).
Court Disposition
Application under s.171C (N.S.W. No.41 of 1982) dismissed; orders made in part in V No.6 of 1981; balance of relief stood over for a fixed period; declaration that Rule 15(d) contravenes s.140(1) of the Act made; liberty to apply reserved.
Orders
- Application N.S.W. No.41 of 1982 under s.171C dismissed.
- Orders made in terms of paragraphs 4 and 5(a), (b) of the rule nisi in V No.6 of 1981, requiring respondents (except Association) to treat certain Council resolutions as null and void until duly certified by the Registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment