Shillington v Harries [2013] NSWSC 1202
The defendant is neither a 'client' nor a 'third party payer' within the meaning of the Legal Profession Act 2004 because the legal services were provided to the trustees (plaintiffs), not to or for the defendant (beneficiary), and the defendant owed only an equitable, not a legal, obligation to indemnify trustees for legal costs incurred; no legal obligation to pay was imposed by court orders or contract.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Summons / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations made that the defendant is not a client or third party payer for the relevant legal services; associated costs orders made in favour of the plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Assessment' 'meaning of Client Under Legal Profession Act 2004' 'meaning of Third Party Payer Under Legal Profession Act 2004' 'trustee Indemnity for Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summons / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the defendant, as a beneficiary of a trust, is a 'client' of the trustees for the purposes of the Legal Profession Act 2004" "Whether the defendant is a 'third party payer' under the Legal Profession Act 2004 in relation to legal costs incurred by the trustees"]
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant is neither a 'client' nor a 'third party payer' within the meaning of the Legal Profession Act 2004 because the legal services were provided to the trustees (plaintiffs), not to or for the defendant (beneficiary), and the defendant owed only an equitable, not a legal, obligation to indemnify trustees for legal costs incurred; no legal obligation to pay was imposed by court orders or contract.
Court Disposition
Declarations made that the defendant is not a client or third party payer for the relevant legal services; associated costs orders made in favour of the plaintiffs.
Orders
- ["The costs of the first plaintiff and the second plaintiff in these proceedings be paid from the fund held by them on trust pursuant to the orders made by the Family Court of Australia in matter number (P)SYC C5110/2008 on 11 March 2011, 23 November 2011 and 30 November 2011 ('the trust fund')." 'Richard Harries...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment