Mortimer v David; Estate Dawn Audrey Day deceased [2005] NSWSC 1166
The plaintiffs were permitted to bring the proceeding because the earlier grant had been made in their absence in circumstances attributable to their solicitor. On the merits, the propounder of the will did not discharge the onus of establishing that the will had been lost by the synagogue or one of its members. On the balance of probabilities the deceased obtained possession of the will and it was last seen in her possession by her sons; because it was not found after her death, the presumption that she destroyed it with an intention to revoke it was not rebutted. The existing grant with a copy will annexed was therefore revoked and administration on intestacy was granted to the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceeding for Revocation of Letters of Administration With a Copy of a Will Annexed and for Letters of Administration on Intestacy / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed revoked; letters of administration on intestacy granted to the plaintiffs as next of kin.
- Legal Topics
- ['revocation of Letters of Administration' 'lost Will' 'presumption of Revocation' 'letters of Administration With Will Annexed' 'letters of Administration on Intestacy' 'solemn Form and Common Form Grants' 'setting Aside Judgment or Grant Made in Absence of a Party' 'estoppel by Judgment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceeding for Revocation of Letters of Administration With a Copy of a Will Annexed and for Letters of Administration on Intestacy / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether letters of administration with a copy of the 2 December 1997 will annexed should be revoked.' 'Whether the 2 December 1997 will was lost or was last traced to the deceased and presumed revoked by destruction.' 'Whether the evidence established on the balance of probabilities that the deceased obtained possession of the will before death.' 'Whether the plaintiffs were bound by the earlier revocation proceedings or whether the grant made in their absence could be set aside.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs were permitted to bring the proceeding because the earlier grant had been made in their absence in circumstances attributable to their solicitor. On the merits, the propounder of the will did not discharge the onus of establishing that the will had been lost by the synagogue or one of its members. On the balance of probabilities the deceased obtained possession of the will and it was last seen in her possession by her sons; because it was not found after her death, the presumption that she destroyed it with an intention to revoke it was not rebutted. The existing grant with a copy will annexed was therefore revoked and administration on intestacy was granted to the...
Court Disposition
Letters of administration with a copy of the will annexed revoked; letters of administration on intestacy granted to the plaintiffs as next of kin.
Orders
- ['Order that letters of administration with a copy of the will dated 2 December 1997 annexed granted on 10 May 2004, be revoked and that the original grant be deposited in the Registry.' 'Order that letters of administration of the estate of the deceased be granted to the plaintiffs as next of kin of the deceased.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment