Kirby v Centro Properties Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 1144

Kirby v Centro Properties Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 1144

Given the range, significance, and number of contested factual findings made by the judge in the prior ASIC proceeding, which are now directly relevant to and in dispute in the present proceedings, a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not be able to bring an impartial mind to the current cases. Therefore, the judge should be disqualified from hearing the trial.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Recusal / Bias / Interlocutory Decision on Recusal Due to Apprehension of Bias
Outcome
Judge recused/disqualified due to apprehension of bias
Legal Topics
['apprehension of Bias' 'judicial Disqualification' 'practice and Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Judicial Recusal / Bias / Interlocutory Decision on Recusal Due to Apprehension of Bias

  1. 1 ['Whether a reasonable apprehension of bias arises due to the judge’s prior factual findings in related proceedings and thus requires disqualification from hearing the present cases.']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the range, significance, and number of contested factual findings made by the judge in the prior ASIC proceeding, which are now directly relevant to and in dispute in the present proceedings, a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not be able to bring an impartial mind to the current cases. Therefore, the judge should be disqualified from hearing the trial.

Court Disposition

Judge recused/disqualified due to apprehension of bias

Orders

  • ['The judge disqualified himself from hearing the trial of these proceedings.']