Kirby v Centro Properties Limited (No 2) [2011] FCA 1144
Given the range, significance, and number of contested factual findings made by the judge in the prior ASIC proceeding, which are now directly relevant to and in dispute in the present proceedings, a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not be able to bring an impartial mind to the current cases. Therefore, the judge should be disqualified from hearing the trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Recusal / Bias / Interlocutory Decision on Recusal Due to Apprehension of Bias
- Outcome
- Judge recused/disqualified due to apprehension of bias
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehension of Bias' 'judicial Disqualification' 'practice and Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Recusal / Bias / Interlocutory Decision on Recusal Due to Apprehension of Bias
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a reasonable apprehension of bias arises due to the judge’s prior factual findings in related proceedings and thus requires disqualification from hearing the present cases.']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the range, significance, and number of contested factual findings made by the judge in the prior ASIC proceeding, which are now directly relevant to and in dispute in the present proceedings, a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not be able to bring an impartial mind to the current cases. Therefore, the judge should be disqualified from hearing the trial.
Court Disposition
Judge recused/disqualified due to apprehension of bias
Orders
- ['The judge disqualified himself from hearing the trial of these proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment