Kovacs v The Council of the City of Sydney [2018] NSWLEC 1675
Because the parties reached agreements under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decisions were ones the Court could make, including because each modification concerned quantitatively and qualitatively minor alterations to internal walls and fixtures and the modified developments were substantially the same as the originally approved developments, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreements.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Decisions on Modification Applications / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeals upheld; applicant granted leave to rely on amended plans; both modification applications approved subject to conditions and amended General Terms of Approval; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Applications' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'substantially the Same Development' 'victorian Georgian Terraces']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Decisions on Modification Applications / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should make orders giving effect to the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the modification applications could be determined under s 4.55(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 on the basis that the modified development is substantially the same development as originally granted.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreements under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decisions were ones the Court could make, including because each modification concerned quantitatively and qualitatively minor alterations to internal walls and fixtures and the modified developments were substantially the same as the originally approved developments, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreements.
Court Disposition
Appeals upheld; applicant granted leave to rely on amended plans; both modification applications approved subject to conditions and amended General Terms of Approval; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['In matter number 2018/236943, the Appeal is upheld.' 'In matter number 2018/236943, the Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans, copies of which are attached at Annexure "A".' 'In matter number 2018/236943, Modification Application D/2017/1557/A seeking to modify, delete or add to the conditions of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment