Cao v R; McGregor-Macdonald v R [2020] NSWCCA 223
The sentencing judge's reference to the more serious offence was a slip and did not result in sentencing for the wrong offence. The injuries considered in sentencing were associated with wounding and not impermissible. Parity was lacking: Mr Cao received an aggregate sentence not appropriately reflecting his lesser...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Richard Minh Huy Cao; Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Dylan McGregor-Macdonald
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed for Cao; appeal dismissed for McGregor-Macdonald.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeal Against Sentence, Parity, Mistaken Identification of Offence, Reckless Wounding in Company, Aggravating Factors
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Minh Huy Cao
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Dylan McGregor-Macdonald
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentencing judge mistakenly sentenced applicants for a more serious offence than charged
- 2 Whether judge impermissibly took account of injuries amounting to grievous bodily harm
- 3 Parity between co-offenders' sentences
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's reference to the more serious offence was a slip and did not result in sentencing for the wrong offence. The injuries considered in sentencing were associated with wounding and not impermissible. Parity was lacking: Mr Cao received an aggregate sentence not appropriately reflecting his lesser role, warranting a reduction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed for Cao; appeal dismissed for McGregor-Macdonald.
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal in both proceedings.
- Allow the appeal for Cao.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment