Conway v Insolvency & Trustee Service Australia [2003] FCA 321
The applicant should be granted an extension of time as there is a real issue concerning whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered the absence of evidence of what taxed costs would be and if the circumstances gave rise to a provable debt.
- Parties
- Applicant: Richard Peter Conway; Respondent: Insolvency & Trustee Service Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Ruling on Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted to applicant to file and serve notice of appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Provable Debts, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Peter Conway
Applicant
Insolvency & Trustee Service Australia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Ruling on Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether an unassessed costs order constitutes a provable debt in bankruptcy
- 3 Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal failed to consider relevant legal principles regarding provable debts
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant should be granted an extension of time as there is a real issue concerning whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered the absence of evidence of what taxed costs would be and if the circumstances gave rise to a provable debt.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted to applicant to file and serve notice of appeal.
Orders
- Extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal to 4 pm, 11 April 2003
- Appeal, when instituted, stood over to a date to be fixed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment