Ryding v Miles & Ors [2011] NSWSC 718
It is appropriate to vacate the hearing dates since proceeding without plaintiff’s counsel and instructing solicitor could prejudice the plaintiff and defendants can be compensated for costs thrown away.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
- Outcome
- Hearing dates vacated; order for costs thrown away made against plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['vacation of Hearing Dates' 'costs Thrown Away']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether hearing dates should be vacated due to unavailability of plaintiff’s counsel and instructing solicitor' 'Whether costs should be ordered against the plaintiff for vacating the hearing dates']
Ratio Decidendi
It is appropriate to vacate the hearing dates since proceeding without plaintiff’s counsel and instructing solicitor could prejudice the plaintiff and defendants can be compensated for costs thrown away.
Court Disposition
Hearing dates vacated; order for costs thrown away made against plaintiff.
Orders
- ['The hearing dates of 19 to 22 July 2011 be vacated.' 'The plaintiff pay the costs thrown away by the vacation of the hearing date as agreed or as assessed, including the costs of today.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment