Whitfield v Sutherland Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 1520
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied, the pool height standard is a development standard capable of variation, and the proposed development is consistent with planning objectives and does not result in adverse impacts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'appeals' 'local Environmental Planning' 'foreshore Development' 'development Standards Variation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Post Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling and construction of two swimming pools' 'Whether contravention of development standard (pool height above ground level) can be justified under cl 4.6 SSLEP']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent granted as jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied, the pool height standard is a development standard capable of variation, and the proposed development is consistent with planning objectives and does not result in adverse impacts.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA22/0063, as amended, for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house and construction of two swimming pools at land identified as Lot 2 in Deposited Plan 1251699, known as 696A Port Hacking Road, Dolans Bay NSW...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment