RIL Aviation HL 7740 and HL 7741 Pty Ltd v Alliance & Leicester plc & Ors [2011] NSWCA 423
Clause 8.10 of the RILA Financing Deed obliges RILA to pay the management fee to the duly appointed Manager, including any replacement Manager, such as Ladbroke, consistent with the deed's substitution provisions. Further, RILA's direction that funds be paid into a third-party account did not breach the negative pledge clause, as it was given to the Security Trustee (requiring its consent) and any funds would have been held on trust for RILA. Thus, there was no event of default, and the appeals on both issues should be dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: RIL Aviation HL 7740 and HL 7741 Pty Limited; First Respondent: Alliance & Leicester plc; Second Respondent: Allco JS Pty Limited; Third Respondent: Ladbroke Management Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contract, Remuneration of Manager, Appointment of Replacement Manager, Negative Pledge Clause, Trust Intention, Event of Default, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RIL Aviation HL 7740 and HL 7741 Pty Limited
Appellant
Alliance & Leicester plc
First Respondent
Allco JS Pty Limited
Second Respondent
Ladbroke Management Pty Limited
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether RILA is obliged to pay the monthly management fee to Ladbroke as replacement Manager under the RILA Financing Deed
- 2 Whether RILA's conduct in relation to funds constituted a breach of the negative pledge and an event of default
- 3 Whether costs orders should be disturbed
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 8.10 of the RILA Financing Deed obliges RILA to pay the management fee to the duly appointed Manager, including any replacement Manager, such as Ladbroke, consistent with the deed's substitution provisions. Further, RILA's direction that funds be paid into a third-party account did not breach the negative pledge clause, as it was given to the Security Trustee (requiring its consent) and any funds would have been held on trust for RILA. Thus, there was no event of default, and the appeals on both issues should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal and cross appeal dismissed.
- Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment