RILEY v TOWER LIFE AUSTRALIA LTD [1998] NSWCA 185
Discovery was refused because the appellant failed to demonstrate the probable existence of the documents sought and those documents are of the type a defendant is ordinarily entitled to keep confidential for use at trial; the appellant was not under evidentiary disadvantage.
- Parties
- Appellant: Riley; Respondent: Tower Life Australia Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Disability Insurance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Riley
Appellant
Tower Life Australia Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to discovery of certain classes of documents under Pt23 r3 of the Supreme Court Rules
- 2 Whether such documents are of a type which a defendant is entitled to keep confidential for use at trial
Ratio Decidendi
Discovery was refused because the appellant failed to demonstrate the probable existence of the documents sought and those documents are of the type a defendant is ordinarily entitled to keep confidential for use at trial; the appellant was not under evidentiary disadvantage.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment