Ringwood & Ply Pty Ltd v Conform Australia Pty Ltd [2014] NSWDC 316
The defendant did not establish a bona fide defence. Clause 12(a) of the agreement made the plaintiff's delivery records prima facie proof of delivery, so unsigned or unrecognised delivery documents could not themselves evidence non-delivery. The defendant had paid invoices, repeatedly affirmed an intention to pay, accepted minor adjustments for non-delivered items, needed the goods for its business, and did not raise non-delivery until shortly before the hearing. The asserted defence was therefore not fairly arguable in law or fact, so the default judgment was not set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceeding for Goods Sold and Delivered / Defendant's Notice of Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- The defendant's notice of motion to set aside the default judgment was dismissed, and the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- ['default Judgment' 'application to Set Aside Judgment' 'bona Fide Defence' 'goods Sold and Delivered' 'proof of Delivery' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceeding for Goods Sold and Delivered / Defendant's Notice of Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant had a bona fide defence sufficient to justify setting aside the default judgment.' 'Whether the plaintiff should receive indemnity costs for resisting the motion.']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant did not establish a bona fide defence. Clause 12(a) of the agreement made the plaintiff's delivery records prima facie proof of delivery, so unsigned or unrecognised delivery documents could not themselves evidence non-delivery. The defendant had paid invoices, repeatedly affirmed an intention to pay, accepted minor adjustments for non-delivered items, needed the goods for its business, and did not raise non-delivery until shortly before the hearing. The asserted defence was therefore not fairly arguable in law or fact, so the default judgment was not set aside.
Court Disposition
The defendant's notice of motion to set aside the default judgment was dismissed, and the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application.
Orders
- ["The defendant's notice of motion to set aside the default judgment is dismissed." "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment