Bowden v Bowden [1960] HCA 12
The majority held that the Court has a discretion under s. 11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1899-1954 (NSW) to refuse a decree for dissolution where the decree for restitution of conjugal rights was obtained by collusion, deception, or for the purpose of facilitating divorce, and that 'failure to comply' did not arise when the non-compliance was pursuant to prior agreement between the parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales Dismissing Petition for Dissolution of Marriage
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['dissolution of Marriage' 'restitution of Conjugal Rights' 'desertion' 'collusion in Divorce Proceedings' 'discretion in Granting Divorce']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales Dismissing Petition for Dissolution of Marriage
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the court has a discretion to refuse a decree for dissolution of marriage on the ground of non-compliance with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights under s. 11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1899-1954 (NSW), particularly where the original decree was obtained by collusion or deception.' "Whether non-compliance with the decree for restitution, in circumstances where it was agreed between the parties that there would be no resumption of cohabitation, constitutes 'failure to comply' within the meaning of the Act."]
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that the Court has a discretion under s. 11 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1899-1954 (NSW) to refuse a decree for dissolution where the decree for restitution of conjugal rights was obtained by collusion, deception, or for the purpose of facilitating divorce, and that 'failure to comply' did not arise when the non-compliance was pursuant to prior agreement between the parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed.' 'No order as to the costs of the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment