Rizzi v Grazcos Co-operative Ltd [1981] HCA 37
A majority held that the Pastoral Industry Award prescribes a daily rate and contemplates a five-day week, enabling the calculation of a weekly rate for shearers. Thus, the appellant was employed under an award fixing or providing for the fixing of a weekly rate within the meaning of s. 9(8)(a) of the Act, entitling him to compensation based on that rate for the first 26 weeks of incapacity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the High Court on Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['calculation of Compensation for Incapacity' 'interpretation of Award Rates' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the High Court on Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant was remunerated under an award fixing or providing for the fixing of a rate for a weekly or longer period within the meaning of s. 9(8)(a) Workers' Compensation Act 1926 (NSW)" 'Whether the compensation entitlement for the first 26 weeks of incapacity should be based on the current weekly wage rate or the default statutory amount']
Ratio Decidendi
A majority held that the Pastoral Industry Award prescribes a daily rate and contemplates a five-day week, enabling the calculation of a weekly rate for shearers. Thus, the appellant was employed under an award fixing or providing for the fixing of a weekly rate within the meaning of s. 9(8)(a) of the Act, entitling him to compensation based on that rate for the first 26 weeks of incapacity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs.
Orders
- ['Order of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Appeal) set aside.' 'Order that the appeal to that court be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment